A Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Two Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus-Carpenter Coustan Criteria and International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) Criteria



gestational diabetes mellitus, prevalence, Carpenter-Coustan criteria, IADPSG criteria


*Visual Abstracts prepared by Dr. Jerico Gutierrez

Objectives. To compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with GDM diagnosed by Carpenter & Coustan (CC) criteria and by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria.

Methodology. A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted using data of women who were screened and diagnosed with GDM between April 2006-March 2007 using the CC criteria and April 2013-March 2014 using IADPSG criteria. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were noted. Means and proportions were calculated for continuous and categorical variables respectively. Data were analyzed using t-test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney U test for those that were not normally distributed. Pearson Chi-square test was used to find an association between the various outcomes between the two groups.

Results. Among 500 pregnant women screened, 36 were diagnosed GDM in the CC group. In the IADPSG group, 733 women were screened and 167 were diagnosed GDM. Prevalence of GDM was 7.2% in CC group and 22.78% in IADPSG group (p=0.000). There was a statistically significant difference in the number of women who developed hypertension and polyhydramnios among the two groups. Women who had an operative vaginal delivery (16.67% vs. 6.6%, p=0.085) and mean birth weight (3.10±0.55 kg vs. 2.97±0.48 kg, p=0.165) were higher in CC group than the IADPSG group. Among the perinatal outcomes, a statistically significant improvement was found in the number of neonates developing respiratory distress syndrome (p=0.000) and hyperbilirubinemia (p=0.000), when the IADPSG criteria were used.

Conclusion. There is a statistically significant difference between the maternal and neonatal outcomes when the newer IADPSG criteria were used for diagnosis of GDM.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sultana Tahmina, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences

Associate Professor,

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Mary Daniel, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences

Professor & Head,

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology


Roglic G. WHO Global report on diabetes: A summary. Int J Non-Commun Dis. 2016;1(1):3-8. Available from: http://www.ijncd.org/text.asp?2016/1/1/3/184853.

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):406–16. PMID: 23969827 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1.

International Diabetes Federation GDM Resources, 2015. Available from: http://www.idf.org/women-and-diabetes/resource-centre.

O’Sullivan JB, Mahan CM. Criteria for oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes. 1964;13:278–85. PMID: 14166677.

Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144(7):768–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/00029378(82)90349-0.

HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008 8;358(19):1991–2002. PMID: 18463375. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070794.

International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676–82. PMID: 20190296. PMCID: PMC2827520. https://doi.org/ 10.2337/dc09-1848.

World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy, 2013. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85975.

American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2014 ;37(Suppl 1):S14–80. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S014.

Wu ET, Nien FJ, Kuo CH, Chen SC, Chen KY, Chuang L-M, et al. Diagnosis of more gestational diabetes lead to better pregnancy outcomes: Comparing the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria, and the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7(1):121–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12378.

Feldman RK, Tieu RS, Yasumura L. Gestational Diabetes Screening: The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups compared with Carpenter-Coustan Screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):10–7. PMID: 26646142. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001132.

Oriot P, Selvais P, Radikov J, Jacobs JL, Gilleman U, Loumaye R, et al. Assessing the incidence of gestational diabetes and neonatal outcomes using the IADPSG guidelines in comparison with the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in a Belgian general hospital. Acta Clin Belg. 2014;69(1):8–11. https:// doi.org/10.1179/0001551213Z.0000000004.

Duran A, Sáenz S, Torrejón MJ, Bordiú E, Del Valle L, Galindo M, et al. Introduction of IADPSG criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus results in improved pregnancy outcomes at a lower cost in a large cohort of pregnant women: The St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(9):2442–50. PMID: 24947793. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0179.

Hung TH, Hsieh TT. The effects of implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes on maternal and neonatal outcomes. PloS One. 2015;10(3):e0122261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122261.

Benhalima K, Hanssens M, Devlieger R, Verhaeghe J, Mathieu C. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes using the new IADPSG recommendation compared with the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in an area with a low prevalence of gestational diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:248121. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248121.

Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks DA, Hadar E, Agarwal M, Di Renzo GC, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 3):S173–211. PMID: 26433807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30007-2.

Seshiah V, Balaji V, Shah SN, Joshi S, Das AK, Sahay BK, et al. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in the community. J Assoc Physicians India. 2012;60:15–7. PMID: 23405515.

Kong JM, Lim K, Thompson DM. Evaluation of the International Association of the Diabetes In Pregnancy Study Group new criteria: Gestational diabetes project. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39(2):128–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.09.007.

Gopalakrishnan V, Singh R, Pradeep Y, Kapoor D, Rani AK, Pradhan S, et al. Evaluation of the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in North Indians using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study groups (IADPSG) criteria. J Postgrad Med. 2015;61(3):155–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.159306.

Ethridge JK, Catalano PM, Waters TP. Perinatal outcomes associated with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes made by the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(3):571–8. PMID: 25162258. PMCID: PMC4696546. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000412.



How to Cite

Tahmina, S., & Daniel, M. (2017). A Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Two Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus-Carpenter Coustan Criteria and International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) Criteria. Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies, 32(1), 27. Retrieved from https://asean-endocrinejournal.org/index.php/JAFES/article/view/381



Original Articles