TEMOZOLOMIDE THERAPY IN RECURRENT METASTATIC PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA
A CASE-BASED REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.040.S1.172Keywords:
metastatic pheochromocytoma, temozolomide, case reportAbstract
INTRODUCTION
Metastatic pheochromocytoma is rare and the management is complex, requiring multifaceted, multidisciplinary management. Primarily palliative, treatment focuses on tumor control, symptom management, and quality of life. While historically associated with a poor prognosis, improved diagnosis and management, including surgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapies, are extending survival for some patients.
CASE
A 52-year-old female was initially diagnosed in 2013 with non-functioning pheochromocytoma with liver, spleen, and pancreatic tail metastases. She underwent left adrenalectomy, splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and local resection of metastatic liver lesions, followed by trans-arterial chemoembolization of liver metastases. Subsequent follow-up imaging revealed recurrent disease, necessitating further surgical intervention. This included left hemihepatectomy, left nephrectomy, segmental resection of the colon and splenic flexure and excision of a posterior abdominal tumor. Due to the extensive nature of her disease progression, the patient received 4 cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as well as palliative radiotherapy to left thoracoabdominal mass and T9 till L1 vertebrae. Despite undergoing PRRT, the disease continued to progress. A multidisciplinary team discussion led to the initiation of temozolomide treatment in March 2023. The patient has received 22 cycles of temozolomide from 2023 to date, with recent follow-up imaging demonstrating partial response to the treatment.
CONCLUSION
This case report illustrates therapeutic efficacy of temozolomide in metastatic pheochromocytoma. In recent years, temozolomide has shown good outcomes in some metastatic pheochromocytoma patients, especially those with SDHB germline mutation. Temozolomide treatment has been generally considered to have a low toxicity profile, however few studies have noted the development of severe myelosuppression. While the current evidence base is still developing and primarily relies on retrospective data and case reports, ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to yield more definitive conclusions regarding its efficacy and optimal clinical application in metastatic pheochromocytoma.
Downloads
References
*
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hidayatil Alimi Bin Keya Nordin, Tong Chin Voon, Zanariah Binti Hussein

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The full license text is available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode.
To request permission to translate, reproduce, download, or use articles or images for commercial reuse or business purposes from the Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies (JAFES), kindly complete the Permission Request for Use of Copyrighted Material Form and email jafes@asia.com or jafes.editor@gmail.com.
A written agreement will be issued to the requester once permission has been granted.




