Research in the Time of COVID-19: Challenges of Research Ethics Committees
Keywords:research ethics, ethical standards, global health emergencies, ethics review, health research
Compliance with ethics guidelines for research are even more critical in the time of emergency public health situations such as a pandemic. Underpinned by the principles laid out in the 1979 Belmont report, conduct of research at any time should focus on respect for persons, beneficence and justice. Certain Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in research ethics committees may be revised to provide a quicker turn-around and timely review. Key elements in effective review of studies include rigorousness, responsiveness and timeliness. It is crucial to recognize that ethics review committees share responsibility with researchers and its institutions, funding agencies and regulatory agencies for upholding ethical principles in research at all times.
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. Available at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html.
Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. 2017 National ethical guidelines for health and health-related research version 2. The research ethics review process. 2018. Available at http://www.ethics.healthresearch.ph/index.php/2012-04-19-05-10-10/297-2017-national-ethical-guidelines-revision.
World Health Organization. Ethical standards for research during public health emergencies: Distilling existing guidance to support COVID-19 R&D. 2020. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331507.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Research in global health emergencies: Ethical issues. 2020. https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/RGHE_full_report1.pdf.
Saxena A, Horby P, Amuasi J, et al. Ethical preparedness: Facilitating ethics review during outbreaks, recommendations from an expert panel. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060618. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x.
PHREB resolution on conduct of ethics review during COVID-19 (personal communication).
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141714. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Zhang H, Shao F, Gu J, Li L, Wang Y. Ethics committee reviews of applications for research studies at 1 hospital in China during the 2019 novel coronavirus epidemic. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1844-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32202608. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091374. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4362.
How to Cite
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International. (full license at this link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode).
To obtain permission to translate/reproduce or download articles or use images FOR COMMERCIAL REUSE/BUSINESS PURPOSES from the Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies, kindly fill in the Permission Request for Use of Copyrighted Material and return as PDF file to firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com.
A written agreement shall be emailed to the requester should permission be granted.