Validation of the Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire (GDMKQ) among Filipino Patients in a Tertiary Medical Center

Authors

Keywords:

gestational diabetes mellitus, knowledge, questionnaire, validation

Abstract

Objectives. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Currently, there are only a few validated tools available that address knowledge in GDM. Recognition of the inconsistencies will provide for an effective learning program to achieve optimal results. This study aimed at validating the “Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire” (GDMKQ).

Methodology. A cross-sectional validation study on GDMKQ among 51 GDM patients aged at least 18 years was conducted in the outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Excluded were those with pre-existing diabetes. The questionnaire was submitted for peer review for translation to Filipino and back-translation. Concurrent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were undertaken as part of the validation process. Descriptive analysis was used for data elaboration by using SPSS v23.

Results. The Filipino version of GDMKQ demonstrated sensible content and face validity. As measured, respondents obtained higher total and domain scores with better knowledge levels of GDM compared to its English version. An overall adequate knowledge was observed among those married and college subgroup as compared to single women and those with secondary level of education. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated at 0.632 using the Kuder-Richardson 20. The test-retest scores using the Filipino-translated questionnaire has a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.853 with moderate to good level of agreement with each other, and Cohen’s kappa of 0.564 with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.828.

Conclusion. The Filipino-translated version of GDMKQ is a valid screening tool that assesses a patient’s knowledge of gestational diabetes. Identifying the level of their understanding will enable clinicians to develop an individualized, effective learning program to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chung JH, Voss KJ, Caughey AB, Wing DA, Henderson EJD, Major CA. Role of patient education level in predicting macrosomia among women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Perineonatol. 2006;26(6):328-32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16642026. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211512.

Evans E, Patry R. Management of gestational diabetes mellitus and pharmacists’ role in patient education. Am J Health-Syst Pharmacol. 2004;61(14):1460-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15332693. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/61.14.1460.

McLarty C. Development of a questionnaire to assess knowledge in women with gestational diabetes. Edith Cowan University. 1993. Accessed August 9, 2022. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/639.

Minschart C, Amuli K, Delameillieure A, Calewaert P, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Multidisciplinary group education for gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective observational cohort study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):509-25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32069855. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073549. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020509.

Alfadhli EM. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J. 2014;36(4):399-406. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5828275. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404472. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.4.10307.

Hussain Z, Yusoff ZM, Sulaiman SAS. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Pilot study on patient’s related aspects. Arch Pharm Pract. 2014;5(2): 84-91. https://archivepp.com/storage/models/article/NyXHz47lcxLXYyvIKpABXRFXxN0jq0yAIspgQ9Guf0kLrq7UZa7pG91nOF3y/gestational-diabetes-mellitus-pilot-study-on-patients-related-aspects.pdf.

Tan G. Diabetes care in the Philippines. Ann Glob Health. 2015;81(6):863-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.10.004

Hussain Z, Yusoff ZM, Sulaiman SAS. Evaluation of knowledge regarding gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with glycaemic level: A Malaysian study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014;9(3):184-90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25132140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.07.007.

Monir N, Zeba Z, Rahman A. Comparison of knowledge of women with gestational diabetes mellitus and healthy pregnant women attending a hospital in Bangladesh. J Sci Found. 2018;16(1):20-6. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsf.v16i1.38175.

Coustan D. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2013;59(9):1310-21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23536513. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.203331.

Szmuilowicz E, Josefson J, Metzger B. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2019;48(3):479-93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31345518. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2019.05.001.

Malong CL, Sia-Atanacio A, Andag-Silva A, Cunanan E. Incidence of postpartum diabetes and glucose intolerance among Filipino patients with gestational diabetes mellitus seen at a tertiary hospital. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2013;28(1):56-63. https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.028.01.11.

Urbanozo H, Isip-Tan I. Association of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed using the IADPSG and the POGS 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test cut-off values with perinatal outcomes in the Philippine General Hospital. 2012;29(2):157-162.

Ku GM, Kegels G. Knowledge, attitude and perceptions of people with type 2 diabetes as related to self-management practices: Results of a cross-sectional study conducted in Luzon, Philippines. Chronic Illn. 2015;11(2):93-107. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24907237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395314538291.

Moore CG, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW. Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4(5):332-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22029804. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x.

Carolan-Olah M, Vasilevski V. Development and validation of the ‘Knowledge of Gestational Diabetes (GDM)’ questionnaire among a sample of women with GDM in Australia. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33568322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.029.

Alayoub H, Curran S, Coffey M, Hatunic M, Higgins M. Assessment of the 476 effectiveness of group education on knowledge for women with newly 477 diagnosed gestational diabetes. Ir J Med Sci. 2018;187(1):65-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28477326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1609-9.

Ogu RN, Maduka O, Agala V, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus knowledge among women of reproductive age in southern Nigeria: Implications for diabetes education. Int Quart Community Health Educ. 2020;40(3):177-83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31554478. https://doiorg/10.1177/0272684X19876526.

Spoelman WA, Bonten TN, de Waal MW, et al. Effect of an evidence-based website on healthcare usage: An interrupted time-series study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(11):e013166. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28186945. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128895. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013166.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-06

How to Cite

Go, H., & Gan, F. R. . (2023). Validation of the Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire (GDMKQ) among Filipino Patients in a Tertiary Medical Center. Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies. Retrieved from https://asean-endocrinejournal.org/index.php/JAFES/article/view/2705

Issue

Section

Original Articles