The Effectiveness of Conducting Home Visits by Medical Students among Malaysians with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Analysis

Kean Ghee Lim, Yogarabindranath Nantha, Nurfazila Kasim, Tarshandiny Ramamoothy, Annabelle Yam, Ern Wei Lim, Matthew Loh

Abstract

Background.Medical students at the International Medical University (IMU), Seremban, Malaysia were required to assess patients at home over a period of two years as a part of their curriculum. The students conducted six visits to educate their patients and help them utilize available resources to manage their disease.

This study aims to examine whether diabetic patients visited improve their control of their disease, specifically in terms of their HbA1c measurement.

Methodology.We used a retrospective, matched case-control study design to prevent biased levels of effort by students conducting the home visits over two years. Information was obtained through reports written by IMU students. Convenient sampling was used to select outpatients undergoing treatment ‘as usual’ from a health clinic and were subsequently matched as controls.

Results.There was a significant decrease in the mean HbA1c among 57 patients with diabetes who were CFCS subjects [from 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) to 7.3% (57 mmol/mol) p<0.001], while the mean HbA1c levels among 107 matched control subjects rose significantly from 7.9% (63 mmol/mol) to 8.3% (67 mmol/mol) (p=0.019) over a similar period. The two groups were controlled for most biological and socioeconomic variables except for comorbidities, diabetic complications and medication dose changes between groups.

Conclusion.Behavioural intervention in the form of home visits conducted by medical students is an effective tool with a dual purpose, first as a student educational initiative, and second as a strategy to improve outcomes for patients with diabetes

Keywords

home visits, medical students, type 2 diabetes, glycated hemoglobin, Malaysia

Full Text:

Abstract HTML

References

Mafauzy M, Hussein Z, Chan SP. The status of diabetes control in Malaysia: Results of DiabCare 2008. Med J Malaysia. 2011;66(3):175-81. PMID: 22111435.

Han L, Ma Y, Wei, S, et al. Are home visits an effective method for diabetes management? A quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8(5):701-8. PMID: 28109182. PMCID: PMC5583953. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12630.

Spencer MS, Rosland AM, Kieffer EC, et al. Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(12):2253-60. PMID: 21680932. PMCID: PMC3222418. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.300106.

Rothschild SK, Martin MA, Swider SM, et al. Mexican American trial of community health workers: A randomized controlled trial of a community health worker intervention for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):1540-8. PMID: 23947316. PMCID: PMC4103223. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301439.

Estey AL, Tan MH, Mann K. Follow-up intervention: Its effect on compliance behavior to a diabetes regimen. Diabetes Educ. 1990;16(4):291-5. PMID: 2357919. https://doi.org/10.1177/014572179001600408.

Taylor KI, Oberle KM, Crutcher RA. Promoting health in type 2 diabetes: Nurse-physician collaboration in primary care. Biol Res Nurs 2005;6(3):207-15. PMID: 15583361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800404272223.

Wattana C, Srisuphan W, Pothiban L, et al. Effects of a diabetes self-management program on glycemic control, coronary heart disease risk, and quality of life among Thai patients with type 2 diabetes. Nurs Health Sci. 2007;9(2):135-41. PMID: 17470188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00315.x.

Stroup J, Kane MP, Busch RS, Bakst G, Hamilton RA. The diabetes home visitation program. Am J Pharm Educ 2003;67(3):Article 91.

Couper JJ, Taylor J, Fotheringham MJ, Sawyer M. Failure to maintain the benefits of home-based intervention in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(12):1933-7. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.12.1933.

YH. Evaluation of Community and Family Case Studies (CFCS): A community based training of medical students. Med J Malaysia. 201;68(2):111-4. PMID: 23629554.

Institute for Public Health (IPH) 2015. National Health and Morbidity Survey 2015 (NHMS 2015). Vol. II: Non-Communicable Diseases, Risk Factors & Other Health Problems; 2015. http://iku.moh.gov.my/images/IKU/Document/REPORT/nhmsreport2015vol2.pdf.

Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Eccles M, Steen N. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Family Pract. 2000;17 Suppl 1:S11-18. PMID: 10735262.

Phillips PJ. HbA1c monitoring and glycaemia. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(1-2):37-40. PMID: 22276282.

Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405-12. PMID: 10938048. PMCID: PMC27454. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.

Al-Lawati JA, Barakat MN, Al-Maskari M, Elsayed MK, Al-Lawati AM, Mohammed AJ. HbA1c levels among primary healthcare patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Oman. Oman Med J. 2012;27(6):465-70. PMID: 23226816. PMCID: PMC3515045. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2012.111.

Klein G. Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):456-60. PMID: 18689053. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385.